The Yogachara School: The Idealistic Perspective of Mahayana Buddhism

Introduction

The Yogachara school of Buddhism, also known as the “Mind-Only” school, is a profound and influential philosophical tradition that emerged in India during the 4th and 5th centuries CE. Rooted in the teachings of Mahayana Buddhism, Yogachara offers unique insights into the nature of mind, perception, and the ultimate nature of reality. The Yogachara school is one of the two most important Mahayana Buddhism schools in India, the other being Madhyamaka.

The name “Yogachara”, which in Sanskrit translates as “Yoga practice”, is derived from an important text of the school, the “Yogacharabhumi-shastra” (“The Science of the Stages of Yoga Practice”). Yogachara emphasizes phenomenology and ontology through the viewpoint of meditative and yogic practices, seeking to unravel the intricacies of the mind and the processes that shape our perception of the phenomenal world (unreality) is created.

At the heart of Yogachara’s teachings is the doctrine of “Consciousness Only” which provides profound insights into the nature of consciousness and perception, and for this the school is also called “Vijnanavada” (the doctrine of Consciousness). 

The foundation of Yogachara is traditionally attributed to the two brothers Asanga and Vasubandhu, however Maitreya, the teacher of Asanga, is the actual founder of the school. Both Asanga and Vasubandhu played key roles in shaping the development of Yogachara thought. Their seminal texts, such as the “Yogacharabhumi Shastra” and the “Mahayana-Samparigraha Shastra”, expounded upon the intricate philosophical doctrines of Yogachara. The school held a prominent position in Indian Buddhism for centuries and had a tremendous influence on Vajrayana or Tibetan Buddhism and east Asian Buddhism. 

Featured image:Thomas NordwestBuddhist Monk in Meditation 2023-05-22-1CC BY-SA 4.0 

4.8

You may also like:

The Madhyamaka School: The Middle Way Perspective of Mahayana Buddhism

Mahayana Buddhism: The Essence of the Great Vehicle

Vajrayana Buddhism: The Heart of the Diamond Vehicle

Table of Contents

Yogachara: Philosophical Foundations and Influences

Yogachara has a rich historical background and enjoyed a prominent position in Indian Buddhism for centuries. Its development can be traced within the broader context of Mahayana Buddhism and the evolution of Buddhist philosophy in India and beyond. The early roots of Yogachara can be found in the Abhidharma tradition of early Buddhism, which aimed to systematize and categorize the teachings of the Buddha.

However, it was during the emergence of Mahayana Buddhism that Yogachara began to take shape as a distinct philosophical school. The Mahayana emphasis on compassion, the Bodhisattva path, and the exploration of the nature of reality provided fertile ground for the development of Yogachara thought. 

Two prominent figures in the early development of Yogachara were the brothers Asanga and Vasubandhu. Asanga, through his work on the “Yogachara-Samgraha”, presented a systematic exposition of Yogachara philosophy. Vasubandhu, on the other hand, made significant contributions to Yogachara through his writings and treatises, which explored topics such as consciousness, perception, and the nature of reality.

The Yogachara school’s philosophical framework challenged the realism of Theravada Buddhism and the Madhyamaka school, and had a strong influence in shaping Buddhist philosophy throughout history. 

Yogachara: Asanga
Asanga
Yogachara: Vasubandhu
Vasubandhu

Idealistic Monism and the Mind-Only Doctrine

The Yogachara school’s idealistic perspective posits that ultimate reality is mind or consciousness (citta-matra). It asserts that all phenomena are mere representations or constructs of the mind, devoid of intrinsic existence. This view challenges the notion of an objective external world and emphasizes the subject-object distinction as an illusory concept. 

Influences from Madhyamaka and the Middle Way

The Yogachara school shares a close relationship with the Madhyamaka school of Mahayana Buddhism, which emphasizes the concept of emptiness (Shunyata). While the Madhyamaka school focuses on the negation of inherent existence, the Yogachara school complements this by providing a detailed explanation of how phenomena are experienced and constructed in the mind.

The two schools complement each other, offering different perspectives on the nature of reality. Despite their differences, there have been exchanges and debates between the two schools, contributing to the rich intellectual history of Buddhist philosophy.

The Yogachara School in Historical and Cultural Context

A. Historical Development and Yogachara Texts

The Yogachara school emerged in India in the 4th century CE and reached its peak during the 6th and 7th centuries. Prominent figures such as Asanga and Vasubandhu played crucial roles in systematizing and articulating Yogachara philosophy. Their treatises, such as the “Yogacharabhumi Shastra” and the “Mahayana-Samparigraha,” are considered foundational texts of the Yogachara tradition. Vasubandhu ideas written down in verses and compiled into Abidharmagosh, one of the most important and sophisticated works on cognition, perception and logic in buddhist philosophy.

Important commentaries on Yogachara texts were written by important Buddhist thinkers and philosophers such as Sthiramati, Darmapala and Santarakshita. Between the 7th and 8th century, a synthetic philosophy of Madhyamaka and Yogachara, known as “Yogācāra-Madhyamaka” begun to emerge, based on the work of Indian Buddhist philosopher Santarakshita. It was a synthesis of three major trends in Indian Buddhist thought at the time: the Madhyamaka thought of Nagarjuna, the Yogachara thought of Asanga, and the logical and epistemological thought of Dharmakirti, into one consistent and coherent system.

B. Yogachara and East Asian Buddhism

The Yogachara school’s influence spread to East Asian countries, where it merged with local cultural and philosophical traditions. In China, it was known as the Faxiang school, while in Japan, it became known as the Hosso school. These adaptations further enriched the Yogachara teachings and their integration into the broader Buddhist landscape. tremendous influence in Tibetan Buddhism and East Asian Buddhism The Yogachara school has had a significant impact on Buddhism, particularly in East Asian countries, where it flourished and influenced various traditions, including Tibetan Buddhism.

The influence of Yogachara spread beyond India, reaching Central Asia and eventually East Asia. It was transmitted to China, where it merged with indigenous Chinese philosophy and evolved into what is known as East Asian Yogachara. The teachings of Yogachara were also adopted in Korea and Japan, where they influenced the development of Zen Buddhism and other schools.

In Tibet, Yogachara found a receptive audience and became an integral part of Tibetan Buddhist traditions. It was introduced to Tibet through the translations and teachings of Indian masters, and it merged with the existing Tibetan Buddhist schools, particularly the Nyingma and Kagyu lineages. Yogachara provided a philosophical framework that complemented the contemplative practices and meditative techniques of Tibetan Buddhism, contributing to the richness and diversity of Tibetan Buddhist thought.

Key Concepts and Practices in the Yogachara School

At the heart of Yogachara philosophy lies the “Consciousness-Only” (Vijñapti-mātra) doctrine. According to this view, the nature of reality is fundamentally based on consciousness. It posits that all phenomena, including external objects, are manifestations of mind.

The Yogachara school emphasizes the role of consciousness in shaping our perception and experience of reality. It emphasizes that our experience is not a direct reflection of an external reality but is constructed and influenced by the interplay of eight consciousnesses. Through meditation and introspection, Yogachara practitioners seek to understand the nature of consciousness, transcend its limitations, and cultivate wisdom and liberation.

Within the Yogachara framework, the Three Natures (Tri-svabhava) theory provides a nuanced understanding of the nature of reality. The Imaginary Nature (parikalpita) reflects the illusory nature of conventional reality, while the Dependent Nature (paratantra) illuminates the interdependent nature of phenomena. The Absolute Nature (pariniṣpanna) represents the ultimate reality beyond conceptual constructs.

A. The Doctrine of “Consciousness-Only”

At its core, the doctrine of “Consciousness Only” asserts that all phenomena are ultimately nothing but manifestations of mind or consciousness. It posits that external objects and the world we perceive are not independently existing entities, but rather projections of our own consciousness. According to this view, the external world is considered to be a construct of our own mental processes. Everything is impressions or sensory expressions only presenting themselves as external objects. This view challenges the conventional understanding of reality as an external, independent entity. 

The doctrine of “Consciousness Only” does not deny the existence of external objects or the conventional world. It acknowledges that there is a shared, intersubjective reality that we all experience. However, it posits that the nature of that reality is ultimately dependent on the mind’s perception and interpretation.

The purpose of understanding “Consciousness Only” is to develop insight into the nature of perception and to cultivate wisdom and liberation. By recognizing that our experience of the world is shaped by our own consciousness, we can begin to question and transcend our habitual patterns of perception and conceptualization.

B. The Concept of Eight Consciousnesses

The concept of the eight consciousnesses plays a central role in understanding the nature of perception, cognition, and the workings of the mind. These eight consciousnesses provide a framework for comprehending the subjective experience and the process of perception from a Yogachara perspective. 

The Five Sense Consciousnesses (pañca vijñānakāyāḥ)

The first five consciousnesses are associated with the five senses and their corresponding objects. They are:

  1. Eye Consciousness: The consciousness that arises in response to visual stimuli and perceives forms and colors. 
  2. Ear Consciousness: The consciousness that arises in response to auditory stimuli and perceives sounds. 
  3. Nose Consciousness: The consciousness that arises in response to olfactory stimuli and perceives smells. 
  4. Tongue Consciousness: The consciousness that arises in response to gustatory stimuli and perceives tastes. 
  5. Body Consciousness: The consciousness that arises in response to tactile stimuli and perceives tactile sensations. 

These five consciousnesses are considered to be direct and immediate, providing us with direct sensory experiences of the external world.

The Sixth Consciousness: Manas (mano-vijñāna)

Manas is the sixth consciousness and is closely associated with mental activities such as thinking, conceptualization (ideation), and discrimination. It plays a role in processing and interpreting the information received from the five senses. Manas is responsible for constructing mental representations and concepts based on the sensory input. It operates on a conceptual level, categorizing, evaluating, and comparing the sensory information to create a coherent and meaningful interpretation of the world.

The Seventh Consciousness: Defiled Mental Consciousness (kliṣṭa manovijñāna)

The seventh consciousness is known as the defiled mental consciousness. It represents the storehouse of karmic imprints, habitual patterns, and latent tendencies accumulated from past experiences and actions. It includes both positive and negative mental imprints that influence our thoughts, emotions, and behavior.

This consciousness is often associated with the sense of self and the perpetuation of delusion and suffering. It is conditioned by ignorance and serves as the basis for the arising of the cycle of samsara, the cycle of birth and death. 

The Eighth Consciousness: Alaya-Vijnana (ālaya-vijñāna)

Alaya-vijnana, also known as the storehouse consciousness or the eighth consciousness, is the foundation of the other seven consciousnesses. It serves as the repository of all the karmic imprints and experiences throughout countless lifetimes. Alaya-vijnana is considered to be the deepest layer of consciousness, underlying and supporting the other consciousnesses. It is the storehouse of all the seeds of past actions, which manifest as mental formations and experiences in the present.

From a Yogachara perspective, the ultimate nature of alaya-vijnana is said to be empty and devoid of inherent existence, just like all phenomena. The concept of Alaya Vijnana was met with controversy by adherents of Madhyamaka.

It is important to note that the interpretation and understanding of the eight consciousnesses may vary within different branches of Yogachara and among different Buddhist scholars. The interpretation of the eight consciousnesses is a complex and nuanced subject, with variations in different texts and commentaries.

Some interpretations may place greater emphasis on the role of the storehouse consciousness or delve deeper into the nature of each consciousness. Nonetheless, the fundamental idea remains consistent: the eight consciousnesses provide a framework for understanding the workings of the mind and the subjective experience of perception and cognition.

Practical Implications of the Eight Consciousnesses

The concept of the eight consciousnesses in Yogachara has practical implications for spiritual practice. By recognizing and understanding the various layers of consciousness, practitioners can engage in transformative practices aimed at purifying and purging defilements, overcoming delusion, and ultimately awakening to the true nature of reality.

Through meditation, contemplation, and mindfulness, practitioners can observe the arising and passing away of the different consciousnesses, gaining insight into their impermanent, conditioned nature. This process of self-inquiry and self-transformation enables the practitioner to develop wisdom, compassion, and skillful means to alleviate suffering and cultivate positive qualities.

C. The Three Natures of Perception

Within the Yogachara framework, the Three Natures of Perception (Tri-Svabhava) theory provides a nuanced understanding of the nature of reality. The Imaginary Nature (Parikalpita) reflects the illusory nature of conventional reality, while the Dependent Nature (Paratantra) illuminates the interdependent nature of phenomena. Finally, the Absolute Nature (Pariniṣpanna) represents the ultimate reality beyond conceptual constructs. In essence, the Three Natures concept constitutes Yogachara’s explanation of Madhyamaka’s Concept of Emptiness (Shunyata). 

The three natures of perception, also known as the threefold division of reality or the three natures, provide a framework for understanding the nature of phenomena and the way we perceive them. These three natures are essential to Yogachara’s analysis of perception and the nature of reality. According to the Yogachara there are three ways to perceive the world: 

Parikalpita-svabhava (Imaginary Nature)

The first nature is the parikalpita-svabhava, which refers to the imaginary or constructed nature of phenomena. It represents the subjective aspect of perception, where we superimpose conceptual labels, interpretations, and projections onto our experience. This process involves the imposition of concepts, categories, and dualistic distinctions, creating a sense of subject-object duality and a fragmented view of reality.

According to Yogachara, this imaginary nature arises from our cognitive habits, conditioned by ignorance and conceptual proliferation. It is a product of our mental constructions and projections that veil the true nature of reality. In this mode of perception, we perceive things as separate, permanent entities with inherent existence, rather than recognizing their interdependent and interconnected nature.

The parikalpita-svabhava is seen as a deluded way of perceiving reality, as it perpetuates the cycle of samsara, the cycle of suffering and delusion. It is through the cultivation of wisdom and insight that Yogachara practitioners seek to transcend this imaginary nature and penetrate the ultimate reality.

Paratantra-svabhava (Dependent Nature)

The second nature is the paratantra-svabhava, which refers to the dependent or interdependent nature of phenomena. It represents the objective aspect of reality, highlighting the interconnectedness and interdependence of all phenomena. According to Yogachara, everything exists in dependence on other factors and is devoid of inherent existence.

The paratantra-svabhava recognizes that all phenomena arise in dependence on causes and conditions, and they cease to exist when those conditions change. This nature emphasizes the impermanent, transient, and ever-changing nature of reality. It challenges the notion of fixed, independent entities and invites a more holistic and interconnected view of existence.

The understanding of the dependent nature helps practitioners let go of rigid concepts and attachments, cultivating a deeper appreciation of the interconnectedness of all things. It serves as a foundation for the practice of compassion and non-dualistic perception, recognizing the shared nature of suffering and the interconnected web of existence.

Pariniṣpanna-svabhava (Consummate Nature)

The third nature is the pariniṣpanna-svabhava, which refers to the consummate or ultimate nature of phenomena. It represents the true nature of reality, beyond the constructs of conceptualization and dualistic perceptions. The consummate nature is empty of inherent existence and transcends all conceptual limitations.

From a Yogachara perspective, the consummate nature is described as the ultimate reality of emptiness (sunyata). It is the true nature of all phenomena, free from conceptual elaboration, and devoid of inherent existence. This nature points to the non-dualistic and undifferentiated nature of reality, where subject and object, self and other, are transcended. Parinispanna is the absolute nature of reality, beyond comprehension. It is known only by the Buddha and the Bodhisattvas.

The realization of the consummate nature is the ultimate aim of Yogachara practice. Through meditation, introspection, and the cultivation of wisdom, practitioners seek to penetrate the veils of conceptualization and directly experience the emptiness and luminosity of the consummate nature.

Practical Implications of the Three Natures

These three natures of perception in Yogachara provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the nature of phenomena and the way we perceive them. They guide practitioners on the path of insight and liberation, encouraging a shift in perception from the deluded imaginary nature to the recognition of the interdependent and ultimately empty nature of reality.

By developing a deep understanding of the imaginary nature, practitioners can loosen their attachment to fixed concepts and views, allowing for a more open and flexible perception. 

The contemplation of the dependent nature encourages practitioners to recognize the interconnectedness of all beings and phenomena. This understanding nurtures compassion and the recognition of the interdependence of suffering and well-being. Practitioners develop empathy and engage in compassionate actions that are rooted in the recognition of the shared nature of existence.

The consummate nature serves as the ultimate goal of realization in Yogachara. Through deep meditation and insight practices, practitioners strive to penetrate the illusion of inherent existence and directly experience the luminous emptiness of reality. This realization brings about a profound transformation in perception and a deep sense of freedom from the constraints of dualistic thinking.

It is important to note that the understanding and realization of the three natures are not sequential stages but are intertwined and interdependent. Each nature informs and supports the others, and they are ultimately experienced as an integrated whole.

D. Meditative and Yogic Practices

As the name of the school suggests, Yogachara places a strong emphasis on yogic practices as a means to attain liberation. These practices involve cultivating mindfulness, concentration, and insight to develop a deep understanding of the mind and its processes. Through dedicated yogic practice, practitioners aim to transcend the limitations of conventional perception and gain insight into the true nature of reality.

The “Yogacarabhumi-Sastra” (Treatise on the Foundation for Yoga Practitioners) describes the different stages of meditation on the path to awakening and the four investigations a bodhisattva must perform. 

E. Yogachara and the Bodhisattva Path

Yogachara is closely intertwined with the Bodhisattva path, which is the path of awakening and compassion undertaken by Bodhisattvas—beings who aspire to attain enlightenment for the benefit of all sentient beings. The teachings of Yogachara provide a profound philosophical framework that supports and guides Bodhisattvas on their path towards liberation and the alleviation of suffering.

The Bodhisattva, guided by Yogachara philosophy, recognizes that conventional realities exist and function, but they lack inherent or independent existence. This understanding helps the Bodhisattva develop a sense of equanimity and non-attachment, as they see through the illusions of inherent existence and recognize the interdependent and empty nature of phenomena. Understanding the empty nature of phenomena, including the self, the Bodhisattva develops a compassionate attitude free from dualistic distinctions and prejudices. 

The Four Investigations

The Four Investigations in Yogachara are a set of contemplative practices or inquiries that are considered essential for a Bodhisattva, one who aspires to attain Buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings. These investigations serve as a means to deepen one’s understanding of the nature of reality and to cultivate wisdom, compassion, and skillful means. 

The key to understanding reality is understanding the mind. There are four investigations in Yogachara for examining the nature we perceive things: 

1. Investigating the name of things

Names are just symbols we ascribe to things and they are not the same as the thing itself. It is important to have a correct view of the separation of the name of the thing and the thing itself.

2. Investigating things

This means having the correct view that things are things and any attempt to describe them will lead to putting another label. The thing is inexpressible, beyond words. 

3. Investigating the nature of things

Having the correct view of the nature of things. There is no intrinsic nature in things because every thing is interdependent, is made of other things.

4. Investigating the separateness of things

The words and designations we use to describe things do not coincide neither with reality nor with the thing itself. Things go far beyond our notion of separateness.

Conclusion & Final Thoughts

The Yogachara school of Buddhism, with its profound exploration of consciousness, perception, and yogic practices, has had a lasting impact on Buddhist philosophy. The school emphasizes the idea that the external world we perceive is a construct of our own mind. It argues that what we perceive as external objects are actually mental representations or appearances projected by the mind. These appearances are influenced by our karmic imprints, habitual patterns, and conceptual frameworks.

By recognizing the mind as the primary agent in the construction of our experience, the Yogachara school invites practitioners to engage in transformative practices that lead to a deeper understanding of reality and the ultimate liberation from suffering. Through its unique insights and teachings, the Yogachara school continues to enrich Buddhist thought and inspire seekers on the path to awakening.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *